A recent article (available here, PDF)
in the journal Science tackles the
problem of electrification in low-income households with analysis showcasing a
robust technical solution that could be made available for US$25 fixed-cost,
without subsidy. The technology,
solar-powered white light emitting diodes
(WLEDs) are more efficient than fuel-based lighting (biomass, kerosene,
candles, etc) by a factor of 100. In
addition, the article’s author, Evan Mills, estimates that fuel-based lighting
accounts for annual worldwide energy consumption of 77 billion liters of fuel
per year – an amount equivalent to US$38 billion per year or US$77 per
household. Mills states:
“Despite the paucity
of lighting services obtained, individual unelectrified households in the
developing world spend a comparable amount of money on illumination as do
households in the developed world.”
With 14% of urban households and 49% of rural households
without electricity as of 2000 (citation here), this
represents a huge market opportunity.
Companies are starting to take high-tech water filters, wireless
telecommunications, and financial tools into low-income communities. When will companies start taking high-tech
approaches to off-grid electrification into those same communities? At $25 per year, some microfinance organizations should think hard about giving loans to purchase these systems.
On Net Impact: "Diarrhea Needs a Rockstar"
On Net Impact: "Diarrhea Needs a Rockstar"
On Net Impact: "Diarrhea Needs a Rockstar"
On Net Impact: "Diarrhea Needs a Rockstar"
On Net Impact: "Diarrhea Needs a Rockstar"