<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.nextbillion.net" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>NextBillion.net - Development Through Enterprise - Stale Focus - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.nextbillion.net/blogs/2005/07/06/stale-focus</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Stale Focus&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Research needed?</title>
 <link>http://www.nextbillion.net/blogs/2005/07/06/stale-focus#comment-188</link>
 <description>Does anyone know of research already done (or even planned) that examines the role of different amounts of aid money; or direct foreign investment; or loans; to changes in poverty levels? To changes in &quot;consumer confidence&quot; (to borrow an American term) levels? To happiness levels as described in Colombia in _Gaviotas_? Surely someone must have ideas on the true relative value of money spent in different ways towards the goal(s) of development?&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2005 16:03:06 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>_manicplanet</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 188 at http://www.nextbillion.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Size Demonstrates Potential (although not effectiveness)</title>
 <link>http://www.nextbillion.net/blogs/2005/07/06/stale-focus#comment-185</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Excellent comment. The speeches that I heard and the protestors that I met in Edinburgh last Saturday embodied that same emphasis. Protestors spoke about how much money wealthy governments spent on development, not what effect that spent money had. Many did not even have a clue how to spend the increase in aid that they demanded.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;dl&gt;Although the amount of money spent cannot demonstrate effectiveness, it can demonstrate potential. Larger sums of money can muster more resources. In the above  post, I compared aid to remittances and to trade in order to focus on the potential of other aspects of the global economy to be more cost-effectively captured and channeled by policy makers to meet development goals.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2005 16:53:47 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>_James Mahon</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 185 at http://www.nextbillion.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Dollars and Sense</title>
 <link>http://www.nextbillion.net/blogs/2005/07/06/stale-focus#comment-184</link>
 <description>It may be worth noting the irony that for many years, national governments limited their assessment of foreign aid programs to the amount _spent_. When asked what the U.S. was doing to help Africa, the USG would explain how much money was being spent, and that the amount was increasing, rather than citing trends or success stories of lives changed. Interesting that the above seems to essentially assume that money pumped into developing nations - regardless of the sender, recipient, intended use or actual use - is a good thing, and that if the private sector sends more than the aid sector, that the private sector must therefore be doing more good.&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2005 11:26:57 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 184 at http://www.nextbillion.net</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Stale Focus</title>
 <link>http://www.nextbillion.net/blogs/2005/07/06/stale-focus</link>
 <description>

&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;The Economist: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/printedition/displaystory.cfm?Story_ID=4129031&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;Helping
Africa Help Itself&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;i&gt; &lt;/i&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/world/africa/displaystory.cfm?story_id=4127278&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;The
$25 Billion Question&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/business/displayStory.cfm?story_id=4138482&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;Doing
Business in Africa&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;o:p /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;




&lt;p&gt;In light of the G8 summit, &lt;i&gt;The Economist&lt;/i&gt; published several articles
related to foreign aid to &lt;st1:place&gt;Africa&lt;/st1:place&gt; in this week&#039;s edition.
One, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/printedition/displaystory.cfm?Story_ID=4129031&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;Helping
Africa Help Itself&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, advocates foreign aid on the basis that
it constitutes a relatively small amount of rich countries&#039;s GDP, and that a
few foreign aid projects, particularly in disease eradication, have had large
impacts on the lives of the poor. Another,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/world/africa/displaystory.cfm?story_id=4127278&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;The
$25 Billion Question&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;,
includes shocking statistics of the misuse of foreign aid, due to the inability
of donors to properly align the incentives of government bureaucrats to ensure
that they use the aid as intended by the donors. A third, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/business/displayStory.cfm?story_id=4138482&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;Doing
Business in Africa&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, describes the healthiness of the business climate in &lt;st1:place&gt;Africa&lt;/st1:place&gt;,
and the success of large, African firms.&lt;o:p /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nextbillion.net/blogs/2005/07/06/stale-focus&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nextbillion.net/blogs/2005/07/06/stale-focus#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.nextbillion.net/blogs/topic/miscellaneous">Miscellaneous</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2005 17:32:02 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>_James Mahon</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">622 at http://www.nextbillion.net</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
