<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.nextbillion.net" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>NextBillion.net - Development Through Enterprise - A Note of Caution on Microfinance - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.nextbillion.net/blogs/2006/03/31/a-note-of-caution-on-microfinance</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;A Note of Caution on Microfinance&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>A Note of Caution on Microfinance</title>
 <link>http://www.nextbillion.net/blogs/2006/03/31/a-note-of-caution-on-microfinance</link>
 <description>
&lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.yearofmicrocredit.org/pages/whyayear/whyayear_highlights.asp#unbanked&quot;&gt;&lt;img vspace=&quot;5&quot; hspace=&quot;5&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; align=&quot;left&quot; src=&quot;http://www.nextbillion.net/image/view/2081&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;With the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.yearofmicrocredit.org/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Year of Microcredit&lt;/a&gt; behind us, and investments in the sector &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nextbillion.net/blogs/2005/12/23/the-year-of-microcredit-a-retrospective&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;accelerating&lt;/a&gt;, rarely do you hear criticisms of the much lauded poverty alleviation tool.  One notable exception is a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.microfinancegateway.org/content/article/detail/31747&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;recent piece&lt;/a&gt; by Thomas Dichter, long-time practitioner in the international development industry and author of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.umass.edu/umpress/FW02/dichter.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;Despite Good Intentions: Why Development Assistance to the Third World Has Failed&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He cautions that “microcredit is an almost perfect case of a phenomenon that has come to characterize much of development assistance - a widening gap between reality and propaganda.”&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Dichter argues that in the rush to scale up microfinance offerings, many newcomers to the field might actually be doing more harm than good.  He points out a number of flaws with the current approach to microfinance, cautioning that there is little historical evidence for the developmental role of credit to the poor; that there has been little rigorous evaluation of the overall benefits of microfinance to a person’s quality of life; and that the poorest of the poor are by definition the ones who &amp;quot;need&amp;quot; credit the most, but can do the least with it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nextbillion.net/blogs/2006/03/31/a-note-of-caution-on-microfinance&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.nextbillion.net/blogs/2006/03/31/a-note-of-caution-on-microfinance#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.nextbillion.net/blogs/topic/financial-services"> Financial Services</category>
 <category domain="http://www.nextbillion.net/blogs/topic/microfinance">Microfinance</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2006 19:10:33 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>John Paul</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2459 at http://www.nextbillion.net</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
