New CGAP Study: Known Knowns And Known Unknowns About Branchless Banking

Submitted by Manuel Bueno on May 20, 2008 - 13:04.

This weekend I had the chance to read CGAP’s new report about branchless banking. The report is a short summary about the current state of the branchless banking market. To those readers who do not know anything of the market it is an easy introduction. To those readers who have been following the sector in recent months, it offers a good peek into the future of what branchless banking may become and what it needs to get done.

The paper lists off seven key observations about the current state of the market, in addition to four uncertainties about how the market will develop and four predictions. In my opinion, most of the seven observations are already well-known. Still, these known knowns are nicely and succinctly explained. Many of these observations were brought up during my interview (see part 1 and part 2) with CGAP’s Mark Pickens.

In my opinion, the most important observation of all corrects the common misconception about poor unbanked people being offered this service. CGAP estimates that in fact less than 10% of branchless banking customers are poor and unbanked. However, CGAP also predicts that poor people will end up using mobile banking more than rich people in about three years, when the market matures and competition increases.

Furthermore, the report emphasizes the importance of developing a dense agent network (one of the reasons why mobile operators have led most mobile banking projects) and how shared agent networks between different banking providers will be crucial for increased savings and to start focusing more on the product offering rather than how to access additional customers.

This is, in my opinion, also related to interoperability between payment platforms. It all basically comes down to a customer being able to use a mobile phone to send money from account in Bank A to account in Bank B.

The key uncertainties or known unknowns are the most interesting part of the report and ask questions that even enthusiastic people like me do not think through enough. Will branchless banking be able to substitute the human touch? How to balance customer convenience and security measures? What about Know Your Customer (KYC) requirements and identity checks? These are all issues that will need to be solved at some point and the way each country deals with them will affect how branchless banking coverage will develop.

The final page of the report has a small list of the most important branchless banking projects to date. A country that is likely to come up in the future is Indonesia, a country with 225 million people which is about to experience an explosion in mobile phone usage. While Indonesia currently has 11 mobile operators and the industry is still in a learning process, the government has decided to push current operators to enable greater network expansion and improve the quality of service. Indonesia’s telecom sector could be currently undergoing a shift in its business model from high tariffs - low usage to low tariffs - high usage. What does this mean? Price will become a more marginal advantage and mobile operators will have to start offering more value-added services. Will financial services be among them? We will see.

On a similar note MTN, one of the most important mobile operators in South Africa and a pioneer in the branchless banking arena has received an informal offer for a controlling stake from Bharti Airtel, India’s largest wireless operator. Vodafone, also an important player in the South African market through its 50% ownership of Vodacom, has also appeared as a possible bidder for the company. Etisalat, a leading Middle East telecoms company, has expressed interest in China Mobile as another potential suitor. Notice that three of these four possibilities would create a mobile powerhouse in emerging economies.
For the time being, Bharti Airtel seems to be on first place and has already discussed with MTN a possible management structure. A merger would create a firm with more than 120 million customers in 22 countries across South Asia, Africa and the Middle East.
Check back with the News section in the coming days to hear the latest…!


. . . . .
Submitted by Jon on May 21, 2008 - 23:41.
Thanks for the great breakdown and analysis of the report Manuel! It is a fascinating area that is bound to make incredible leaps in the coming years. It seems the opportunities are endless with mobile phones, from facilitating small businesses in bangladesh to creating a whole new flowing of finance among the poor. I've been doing a bit of my own research on cell phones and mobile finance in the developing world, more in regards to being able to pay for small transactions via text messaging, and have but one question maybe someone can help me answer. Where's the developed world in mobile banking/finance? Is there even a need? Is security too high of a concern with the establishment of bank accounts and credit cards ect ect already in place?? Just a thought- :)
Submitted by Lou on May 22, 2008 - 09:01.
I agree with Jon on the good breakdown of the report! I have also been studying mobile banking briefly and have noticed that in the developed world, with personal computers and internet banking we moght not be in need of mobile banking. This was just one observation. However, my concern is the following: is mobile banking profitable? Or will it remain beeing another service offered by operators? Is mobile banking alone a bransch for investors to look at? Wondering...
Submitted by Manuel Bueno on May 23, 2008 - 10:25.
Dear Jon and Lou,

Thanks for you comments.
I do agree with Lou's response to Jon's question. The beauty of the m-banking model, in my opinion, is that it creates a network among people with unmet financial needs (be they the BoP or not). Consumers in developed countries might not have such a need - for starters most of us have bank branches in the nearby and at reasonable prices.

However, I am reticent to think that this convergence between sectors is not happening with mobile phone banking in developed countries: witness for example the use of mobile phones as a wallet in some Asian countries or the work done with voice recognition. If you are interested check out this (slightly old) article: http://www.economist.com/search/displaystory.cfm?story_id=8312260

Having said this, security is indeed a concern, but, in my opinion, it should not be a long term barrier to the development of this industry around the (developing and developed) world if there is a need.

About mobile banking being profitable: I did ask that same question to Mark Pickens in the interview we had some time ago (see part 1 of the interview linked in this post), because this information is quite hard to come across. The short answer is that it depends on which firm provides these services and what is their business model (the approach and expertise available will be different depending on it being a mobile operator or a bank). In most cases they are profitable or reaching break even, but you have to take into account that this industry is quite new so the jury is still out on this one.

Regarding possible investments in mobile banking - you know what I like most about mobile telephones is their ability to create a network. Wherever you have networks you have markets and if you control that market you can offer anything (including financial services). You just need to find two groups which would profit from connecting with each other to find a market opportunity. If you are thinking about investing in the mobile banking market specifically I am afraid that it might be tough, since these business are either still in private hands or they belong to a big multinational or a joint venture or some sort between two huge firms. Having said this, In my opinion this market will experience a very strong growth in the next years.
Submitted by Jon on May 23, 2008 - 13:51.
Thanks for the detailed response Manuel. I completely agree, with what you saying- There really may not be a need, or at least a profit to be made, in developed countries. However, the power of companies to create a need is pretty large, so who knows what will happen down the road. Thats the beauty of, as you said, creating a whole new network that leads to a new market. Cell phones have created a whole new marketplace, and each time you set up a new network your essentially setting up a new marketplace. In those regards, you kind of hit on and confirmed something I've been thinking of with your point "You just need to find two groups which would profit from connecting with each other". While I know an M-banking infrastructure needs to be in place before this can happen, but what about Mobile 2 Mobile microloans? People in developed countries will be able to send money from their cell phones (via mobile operator then some large org/bank) that will end up in the cell phone of a farmer or small entrepreneur seeking a very small loan. Lots more involved in the process, but just an outline. Same type of model for donating, ect. Much more M-banking infrastructure needed for this though. Just an example of two people who can connect through a market provided by a network!

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Basic HTML tags are accepted.
  • To ensure that you are human, your comment must first be previewed, then posted to the site. Please click "Preview" to see how your comment will look when posted.