The transformation, when it came, had three separate drivers: 1_ a coordinated, deliberate effort by a consortium of multinational companies to create private-sector-led development strategies in, at first, a small number of countries; 2_ a more bottom-up mesofinance campaign that included mentoring and other enterprise development efforts for small and medium businesses, designed to harness entrepreneurial energy in BOP markets and fund expansion that could create jobs and service delivery; and 3_ a sustained policy-reform effort by a growing number of countries to improve the business environment for large and small business alike to qualify for development funds and attract private investment. A fourth, indirect driver was the growing emergence of innovative solutions and sophisticated technology specifically designed to meet the needs of BOP markets. These together led in 2010 to a tipping point in the perceptions of public officials and development experts, after which the scale of these activities grew very rapidly. We explore each of these drivers and their impact on these recent events in some detail.
THE WORLD DEVELOPMENT CONSORTIUM
It was initially European companies that saw the need and felt the obligation to play a larger role in development—both for the larger social ends and as part of creating additional markets and supply chains. By banding together in a consortium, they were able to lower risk and gain real synergies, as well as gain commitments from national governments and development agencies and withstand local power brokers opposed to change. The focus of the investments was on projects that could become commercially sustainable, even though they might require some initial donor help. For example, investment designed to strengthen farmers and link them to markets was buttressed by rural energy and connectivity infrastructure, which in turn enhanced productivity and living standards and increased the market for both financial services and consumer goods. The consortium also worked closely with UN agencies and sought NGO involvement to ensure that the package of goods and services—and hence the industrial capabilities brought to bear—met community needs. For the companies, the benefits of the consortium approach were increased legitimacy and lowered risk, an advantage in attracting talented staff, development of new markets, and eventually profit. The combined investment of a consortium project—and the status they came to have—was also a powerful incentive for a national government to undertake reforms and provide incentives. In addition, the projects also brought access to international markets, to credit, and to advanced technologies for farmers and local businesses.
To continue reading the article, click here.


add to del.icio.us
add to digg
related at technorati


On Guest Post: What It Means to be Patient - Drip Irrigation in Pakistan's Thar Desert
On Solar Power Distributed Among Rural Poor in the Philippines
On Solar Power Distributed Among Rural Poor in the Philippines
On How Will eBay Affect Peer to Peer Lending?
On For Celtel's Mo Ibrahim, the poorest of the poor are his raison d'etre