Taxes and the Digital Divide - Serious Problems

Submitted by Rob Katz on September 30, 2005 - 09:28.
As an economist and self-styled BOP researcher, I've always been interested in the effect of technology on efficiency, price competition, and cost-of-living at the BOP. WRI, through its now-sunset Digital Dividend project, studied the effect of technology on low-income communities for years, and results pointed to a consistently positive relationship between access to information and greater efficiency, lower COL, etc. Mobile phones, in fact, have always been a favorite technology around here - low start-up cost, relatively minor literacy barrier, shared-use potential, etc. A great BOP technology - and one that's growing fast.

So you'll understand my excitement when I ran across the GSM Association's report, "Tax and the Digital Divide." A robust, regression-based analysis of the effect of taxation on mobile phone penetration!? A BOP economist dream come true.

The report doesn't disappoint. Data and analysis by Deloitte and Touche, Pyramid Research, and Frontier Economics yield robust conclusions about 50 developing countries. Economist or not, the study is quite readable - econ folks will appreciate discussions of price elasticity and time-series regression, while others will glaze over the technical jargon and get excited by the country rankings. Browse the report for everything, but here's a quick summary of the key findings:

  • In 16 of the 50 developing countries in the study, taxes on mobile phones and services represent more than 20% of the total cost of ownership. In these 16 countries, which are home to hundreds of millions of people, the annual cost of taxes ranges from an average of US$24 to US$179 per mobile phone user.
  • Nineteen countries even levy additional taxes, on top of standard sales taxes on mobile phone users. Some of these additional taxes are telecom specific, such as service activation taxes. These special taxes average US$13 per annum per subscriber.
  • 39% of all handsets sold in the 50 countries in the study in 2004 were via the black market, representing a loss of US$2.7 billion in tax revenues.

At NextBillion, we talk a lot about how mobile phones - especially low-cost, pre-paid, shared-use mobiles - are changing the way BOP communities work, live, and interact. Is that true - absolutely. Just look at projects like WIZZIT in South Africa or SMART in the Philippines or Grameen Phone in Bangladesh and Uganda. But entrepreneurs and technology can take it only so far. For BOP communities to get the most out of the potential of low-cost connectivity via mobiles, governments should step up to the plate and engage in serious tax reform. Need proof? Read the report.



. . . . .
Submitted by Rob on October 1, 2005 - 15:24.
Why do you link to Georgetown's economics department? You have a PhD from Georgetown? I thought you have a BA in "Political Economy." How does that make you an economist? And didn't you get most of this from the latest edition of the Economist - that came out online this Thurs or Friday online. (Meanwhile the GSM report has been out for several weeks). Shouldn't you at least credit them?
Submitted by Rob on October 1, 2005 - 15:32.
Wait, maybe you got it from All Africa, http://www.nextbillion.net/node/1399. But shouldn't you have referenced them as well?
Submitted by Rob Katz on October 3, 2005 - 10:12.
Hi, thanks for your comment. As for whether I got this story from the Economist online, I must admit that I didn't see it before writing this post. The impetus to write up an excellent economic analysis by the GMSA came from a news article I saw in AllAfrica - you're right on. Didn't see the Economist article until today - thanks for the heads up. In the interest of full disclosure, I don't consider it a stretch to call myself an "economist" based on my quantitative and qualitative training through Georgetown's BA in Political Economy. That said, I haven't done the requisite research nor quantiatively rigorous coursework that PhD economists must.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Basic HTML tags are accepted.
  • To ensure that you are human, your comment must first be previewed, then posted to the site. Please click "Preview" to see how your comment will look when posted.