Can MNCs succeed at the BOP? Thoughts from the BELL Conference

Submitted by John Paul on July 21, 2005 - 12:07.

I'm at the BELL Conference at Cornell University, and just came out of the Sustainable Innovation for Incumbents discussion, which addressed the challenges MNCs face when creating sustainable global enterprises, including those that tackle the BOP market.  The two main obstacles identified were:  1) how to change the corporate mindset, and 2) what skills / competencies are required.  Both were discussed in depth by the audience, who gave a variety of perspectives on the issues.

Changing mindsets seemed to be the bigger of the two challenges.  Why should a company spend money on a market perceived as having no credit, lots of corruption, and people who don't or can't pay?  There's also a reputation risk for the company if NGOs and other advocacy groups perceive a for-profit company entering these markets as exploiting the poor.  Most corporate systems are driven towards short term profits, while BOP markets are often long-term investments.  It was also pointed out that middle management mindsets are often harder to change than upper management because of their perceived job risk of venturing into unfamiliar activities.  And then there are the institutional biases against development disruptive technologies, as opposed to incremental change.

Incumbent MNCs also need to develop certain skills to succeed in these markets.  They must be able to leverage the value of multiple partnerships, often with NGOs and governments.  They also must learn how to sell to BOP markets, which can be quite different from their prior experiences.  In most companies, there are also pressures to rapidly scale successes in the short term.  Doing so in BOP markets requires additional knowledge and skills.

There seemed to be more challenges offered than solutions, but a few good ones were mentioned.  Companies must create incentives for developing sustainability and succeeding in BOP markets.  For any new activity, a strong business case must be developed to minimize the perceived risk, especially among middle management.  Getting both shareholders and the board of directors behind the initiative is also critical.  New products and services also must be treated as 'normal' within the business; if they are treated as a 'special case' they will be marginalized over time.  Finally, new business models must recognize the differences in corporate cultures, and be designed to fit the ones in which they are implemented.

After the session, I had a brief discussion with the people sitting to my left and right, one a business school professor and the other the Dean of a business school.  They both agreed that SMEs may have a better chance of succeeding than MNCs, because they are more dynamic and better able to change strategies.  I'm not sure I agree, although it does seem easier for an MNC to buy this institutional knowledge by acquiring such a company, then developing it themselves.  I'd be interested in hearing thoughts by others on this site who have had their own experiences trying to change corporate mindsets. 

. . . . .
Submitted by Sara Olsen on July 22, 2005 - 11:27.
In addition to changing mindset, or in tandem with it, I think there are two more critical elements to the strategy. We must work to 1) lengthen the timeframe over which return on investment is calculated (ROI can look very different on a project if it's calculated over 3 years instead of over 5), and/or 2) engineer new financing mechanisms that cause the long-term costs, benefits and impacts of business and development initiatives to be factored into the economics of the earlier-stage investors. This thought occurred to me here at BELL during Hunter Lovins' great talk this AM, when an audience member noted that even if the federal official in charge of the selection of development contractors wants to use a sustainable development approach, unless that approach gets the targeted results in 6 months at the lowest cost, that approach will lose to whatever quick fix type approach is cheaper. To change this, I think the investing public at large, high-level decisionmakers in charge of corporate incentive structures, and people with finance expertise, all need to do their parts-- whether by consumer/shareholder activism, board leadership, or the creation of innovative mechanisms.
Submitted by Bal K Joshi on August 1, 2005 - 20:15.
Hey John, I finally made it to nextbillion.net and got some very interesting articles. I will be closely following various thoughts on BOP stuff. I was looking through some of the questions raised and just wanted to share some of my thoughts. Changing Corporate mindsets.......... I think to change the corporate mindsets, there needs to be change in how a BOP market is identified. I strongly see a need for new data capture methodologies. When a market is identified as a capacity that can spend only $2/day, it will not excite Apple to sell $299 iPod. However, if the market was identified in multiple segments with a skewed income distribution, it might make an interesting case for Apple to explore the potential market. The way the data gets posted today is the entire 4 billion makes only less than few bucks a day. Is that for real?? How about if we were to have data that would identify % of the 4 billion population that could be potential market target for MNCs? Lets assume if the 5% of the 4 billion population made more than $10-$15K per year, would that interest MNCs. Is 200 million people in developing countries that made more than $10K/year a sizeable market for MNC? Why do business in an environment neither have credit and can’t pay a squat? WB and other reports are saying more than 200+ billion USD gets remitted to BOP markets. So how can MNCs get their piece of that action? How can MNCs leverage the credit/financial access a Diaspora has residing in a developed nation, use that as a safety net to explore BOP market? Is that possible? Globalization is here and it is here to stay. So it’s a matter of time for MNCs to carve their product offerings to fit into the global market place. Perhaps one day we will see GM offering financial scheme to a Diaspora in LA to buy a microwave oven in Mexico. Cheers, Bal K Joshi

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Basic HTML tags are accepted.
  • To ensure that you are human, your comment must first be previewed, then posted to the site. Please click "Preview" to see how your comment will look when posted.