Generating the Industries of Tomorrow

Submitted by _Stuart Hart on June 1, 2005 - 16:05.
Published in:

Q. So you really think this whole movement is going to drive itself?

Yes. Eventually, the spoils will go to those who figure out how to do it. And if those who figure out how to do it come from the developing world, then those are the companies that are going to be the companies of the future.  I would bet on the companies that are rising up from the developing world, the companies that are coming from Latin America, from Africa, from India, from China. Those are the companies that are cracking the code, that are figuring out how to do this first. And as a result, they have a beachhead, a strong position to work from, and then to move their way up, over time.

What we need to do is generate the industries of tomorrow, where the future jobs are going to be, and that’s going to be in the space of inherently clean and sustainable technology. And those are going to be knowledge-intensive industries. That’s where the future lies.


. . . . .
Submitted by John Paul on June 8, 2005 - 12:38.
Tom Friedman's op-ed in the Times today touched on the same point: "Even more interesting is how Indian firms are taking the skills they learned from outsourcing and using them to develop low-cost products for the low-wage Indian market: a medical insurance plan for the poor for as little as $10 a year, a $2,000 car, a $200 laptop, supercheap cellphones, a low-fare airline ($75 one-way for the three-hour Bangalore-Delhi flight) that sells tickets from Internet kiosks in gas stations. Indian companies know that if they can make money producing low-cost technology for poor Indians, it gives them an incredible platform to then take these products global. (Imagine the profit potential if they work in the West?) China is doing the exact same thing."


Although both their books are coming at the issue from different direction, Hart and Friedman seem to agree on the main point: if they are to succeed and thrive (or even survive) in the coming decades, established multinationals need to make some fundamental changes in how they do business, and quickly. They can no longer shy away from radical innovation and creative destruction, fearful that it will cannibalize their established businesses, because if they don't lead that process, their competitors will.
Submitted by Rob Katz on June 8, 2005 - 13:46.
Thanks, John, for pointing out Friedman's op-ed. I was about to blog about it but you beat me to it. What I don't understand is how not many others - others, correct me if I'm wrong - in the blog/traditional media are picking up on Friedman's comment about innovations jumping from the BOP back to the (tongue-in-cheek) TOP. If you're a business and you're not already working to serve these under-tapped markets, you might not only be losing out on a potentially huge (4 billion) market but also your existing markets in the North and West. Watch out.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Basic HTML tags are accepted.
  • To ensure that you are human, your comment must first be previewed, then posted to the site. Please click "Preview" to see how your comment will look when posted.