February 26, 2010 — 01:00 pm
Developing a Rigorous Methodology to Assess Impact
Even organizations that are well-intentioned and carry out an impact assessment can end up with unusable data due to implementing a poor methodology. For example, a review of the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) found that many of their evaluations could not assess impact due to methodological shortcomings.1,2 Not only were these projects not able to demonstrate any impact, they also wasted time and money. When developing a rigorous impact assessment methodology, it comes down to being an educated user. No methodology is flawless, but you must understand the effects of the decisions you make regarding methodology on the data you will collect.
Last week during our BoP Impact Assessment Workshop at the William Davidson Institute, we discussed some of these issues around measuring impact with participants from around the world and various fields including the private sector, non-profits and academia. Our main objective was to have participants leave the workshop with an action plan to bring back to their organizations on how to implement the BoP Impact Assessment Framework. During the workshop participants developed a strong understanding of the framework, performed a strategic analysis of their organization's impacts, as well as learned and applied key issues in developing and implementing a robust data collection strategy to their organization. This last aspect highlighted the importance of developing a rigorous methodology to collect impact data at the project level.
So how do you successfully collect impact data at the project level? You must carefully consider several issues around research design, content development, and a data collection process. If one of these components is not done well, then the integrity of the data can suffer.
When thinking about research design, there are a few key decisions to make.
- Will you use a comparison group? If not, will you be able to ensure that the impact you track is actually due to your venture and not something else such as a new law being passed?
- How many data collection points will you use? If you want to show change over time, it is important to consider collecting data before the project affects your potential subjects and again after those affects are measurable.
- How many people should you collect data from in order to be sure you can make conclusions about your data, i.e. will your data be statistically sound?
There are also multiple things to consider when developing the instrument you will use to collect data.
- What impacts do you think are the most important to measure? You want to ensure you don't burden your respondents with too many questions.
- How are you going to administer the instrument? Using the telephone, mail, in-person, internet or a PDA to administer your survey all have implications on your response rate, and the resources that will be necessary.
- Are your questions are reliable and valid? It is important that you ensure your questions are reliable in that they produce the same result when used repeatedly, and valid meaning that the questions measure what they were intended to measure.
- Will you back-translate the instrument? Translating your instrument into the local language, and then back to the original language allows you to compare two different versions for discrepancies.
- How will you pre-test the instrument? Will you use share the instrument with experts in the field for their feedback, will you test your survey's content and process with the target population?
Even if you develop a strong research design and survey instrument, you could end up with unusable data due to how it was collected. Some things to think though when developing your data collection process include:
- Who will collect the data? Your results may be questioned if your organization collects the data instead of a third party. If you use in-person interviews, the gender of the interviewer may influence the respondent's answers.
- When should you collect the data? The time of the year, such as crop harvests may influence the responses.
- Where should you collect data? The environment that you collect the information may also influence responses, such as having on-lookers while the survey is being conducted.
- How will you ensure that the respondent's answers remain confidential?
- How will you find the respondent again at later data collection points?
Despite these many considerations when developing a rigorous methodology to collect impact data at the project level, it isn't difficult. The key is understanding and carefully thinking through each of these issues to inform your decisions around your own methodology.
Footnotes:
1Victoria, C.G. 1995. "A Systematic Review of UNICEF-Supported Evaluations and Studies, 1992-1993." Evaluation and Research Working Paper Series 3. United Nations Children's Fund, New York.
2Savedoff, W., R. Levine, et al. (2006). When Will We Ever Learn? Improving Lives Through Impact Evaluation. Evaluation Gap Working Group. Washington, DC, Center for Global Development.
3316 Views









Comments
A. Horton
Feb 26, 2010
Opinion. .
Concise yet very informative and interesting. . . made me want to research further.
Mazarine
Feb 27, 2010
What you didn't address
Thanks for starting to point the way towards assessing impact for nonprofits. We can't just keep looking at 990s, like CharityNavigator, and base our assessments solely on those.
However, I would take issue with finding the respondents again. Most nonprofits will not have the resources or time to do this. AND there is too much noise in the system. It would be the height of hubris to assume that your nonprofit got that student the A+. For example, home life, family, and other factors are shown to have far greater impact than that afterschool tutoring program.
No, what I feel would be far more effective is allowing nonprofits with similar missions to SHARE their programs and methodologies in one space, so that they can collectively see which programs and methods work, and figure out WHY. This space could be confidental from funders, so that nonprofits whose programs were failing wouldn't have to risk exposure, but could honestly evaluate themselves in front of their peers. Or it could be exposed to funders, and allow funders to see that nonprofits are willing to share their mistakes as well as their successes, and learn from them. What do you think?
http://wildwomanfundraising.com
— Heather Esper replied 187 days ago
We understand that many ventures don't have unlimited resources to conduct impact assessments. At the same time we've worked with a non-profit to collect impact assessment data at two data points from the same individuals for a low cost. By actually finding the same individuals again you can better assess those underlying relationships and causes that got the student the A+. Also to be sure that your initiative and not other variables contributed to the A+, it is important to have a comparison group, otherwise you are right, it may have been family life or something else that contributed solely or in conjunction to obtaining that A+. However, more importantly, conducting an impact assessment can look beyond that A+ and see what effect it has on the life of that individual such as changing family dynamics, self-confidence of that individual, etc. You are right on in your thinking on having a space for organization to share their methodologies and impacts. One such movement to create such a community is IRIS http://www.globalimpactinvestingnetwork.org/cgi-bin/iowa/reporting/index.html. Also our larger research goal at WDI is to understand the intersection of venture strategy and poverty alleviation. Being able to understand this relationship would help investments target certain poverty alleviation outcomes, as well as help ventures learn from one another and improve.
Saurabh
Mar 1, 2010
Learning from program evaluation
Another great post Heather! I am happy to see that BoP impact assessment frameworks are building on the immense amount of literature on traditional program evaluation - many of the techniques for developing rigorous impact assessments already exist, they just need to be adapted to the BoP framework. I recommend the book 'The Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation' by Hatry, Newcomer and Wholey, if you haven't seen it already.
— Heather Esper replied 184 days ago
Thanks! I've been meaning to revisit that handbook. I haven't read it in whole yet, but sections of it were assigned during one of my evaluation courses in grad school.
Amy
Mar 1, 2010
Thanks...
Thank you for this and the link to the BoP workshop - I'll be taking a program evaluation course soon and will keep that in my arsenal. Great stuff and glad to see you not only offering practical guidance but spreading the world that good intentions just aren't enough without a solid system to measure their outcomes.
Sarah
Mar 2, 2010
some good points
In its entirety, I really enjoyed your article. It was very sound it its main points and useful to those in the social venture arena. I think you could add a section though on how the data needs to be collected in a way that is culturally acceptable. You touched on this briefly when discussing that the sex of the interviewer could change the answers of the individual answering. In some cultures, outside people may not be able to get to the root of the answer or the problem. You may have to find an internal way to ascertain your data. Truly knowing the BoP people and being accepted into their way of life is going to be the only true way to make inroads into that market. Otherwise the data collection could end up much like P&G's marketing with Pur....ineffective and negative.
cheap bally handbags
Jul 27, 2010
the society is so ture
I am really thankful to the author of this post for making this lovely and informative article live here for us. We really appreciate ur effort. Keep up the good work!
You are commenting on a reply.
To add a new comment, submit or cancel your comment reply.
Comment on article: Developing a Rigorous Methodology to Assess Impact