
James Ferguson’s critique of the development paradigm in
The Anti-politics Machine focuses on work international agencies were doing in LeSotho to increase family incomes and create a larger cattle market. If I remember the book correctly, the scheme fails due in part to the assumption that if cattle were given to families, they would be able to sell them on the open market and improve their livelihoods.
It turned out that this well-functioning market never materialized due in part to the fact that men were holding onto their livestock indefinitely…. The reason? In this community’s culture, cattle were considered to be the sole property of the husband- if they sold them and brought back cash, their wives would have greater power in the form of disposable income which they could spend without their husband’s oversight. So many of the men simply refused to relinquish control over their household’s wealth.
On Market Creation at the Base of the Pyramid: It Isn't Easy
On Taking BoP Strategies To Scale Pt. 3: World-Class Healthcare for the World’s Poor
On Drishtee: Rural Health Franchising
On Reviewing a New BoP Critique Published in Innovations Journal
On Connecting Base of the Pyramid Producers to Markets