Writing during the US’s dismal performance at the World Cup, David Brooks, liberals’ favorite conservative, threw a low blow in an attempt to level the playing field. “No American player has managed to put a ball into the back of the net, but the U.S. team does lead the world in one vital category: college degrees.” Indeed, Mr. Brooks’s assessment of American academic superiority on the soccer field is correct. But after trumpeting the link between this country’s academic and economic accomplishments, Brooks fails to mention that the United States is also a global leader in many other fields, including green house gas emissions. What cheerleaders of the American economy like Brooks often overlook is that our economic success has been a pyrrhic victory resulting in immeasurable costs to our environment. For countries now starting down the path of development, the history of American capitalism raises many interesting questions about the future of our planet. Among them are these: Is economic growth inextricably linked to environmental degradation? If not, how can developing nations go right where the US has gone wrong?



add to del.icio.us
add to digg
related at technorati



On Net Impact: "Diarrhea Needs a Rockstar"
On Net Impact: "Diarrhea Needs a Rockstar"
On Net Impact: "Diarrhea Needs a Rockstar"
On Biogas for Rwanda's BOP
On Biogas for Rwanda's BOP