Archives

Date
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
Submitted by Rob Katz on December 1, 2006 - 10:35.
Published in:

You may have noticed that from time to time we feature information via IPEG, which stands for International Private Enterprise Group.  Started by a number of Columbia Business School students and professionals including Reuben Abraham and Emeka Okafor, the group aims to create an opportunity for professionals interested in the intersection between business and development to network, learn from each other and hear from leaders in the field.  

At IPEG meetings, we discuss cutting-edge work in investing in emerging economies, sustainable enterprise growth, 'Base of the Economic Pyramid' concepts, heath and technology innovations that serve low-income communities, and many others.  All the reasons that you visit NextBillion.net (we hope).  

While the NYC group has been around for a few years, the DC chapter is just getting started, but both welcome new faces to join its supportive community of people from across disciplines and the private, nonprofit and government sectors. 

(This post continues past the break; click "Read More" to continue)

. . . . .
Submitted by Derek Newberry on December 1, 2006 - 16:13.

I couldn't help myself. Staring at piles of steak, salad and cheese breads I wondered what had gone into this process - what had happened to allow this lunch to reach my table. A meal at Fogo de Chao, the Brazilian Churrascaria downtown, will have that effect on you; and it's easy to get philosophical after a couple caipirinhas and a pound of fraudinha.

Two molecular biologists in India asked the same question, and as with so many of the products we consume in this age of globalization, they found disturbing results.

. . . . .
Submitted by Rob Katz on December 4, 2006 - 09:04.

The Financial Times reported Friday that Citigroup, the world's largest financial firm, will roll out a network of biometric ATMs to better serve low-income Indian neighborhoods. The machines will use thumbprint recognition technology in place of personal identification numbers, and color-coded instructions will be delivered by voiceover to serve the needs of illiterate customers.

Sound familiar? It should – Bolivia's PRODEM rolled out a network of similar machines starting in 1999, as we documented in a What Works case study written by Roberto Hernandez and Yerina Mugica. In the 2003 study, the authors describe how PRODEM’s locally-designed machines work:
The smart card stores the customer's relevant information including name, account number, account balance, five most recent transactions, and digital fingerprint. When customers approach a PRODEM FFP Smart ATM, they receive audio instructions...[they are] instructed to insert their smart card and place their finger on the fingerprint recognition device...The system reads the smart card and matches each customer's fingerprint with the image stored on the card to authorize transactions. The touch screen display is color-coded to ensure that the customer can follow the verbal instructions (blue button for withdrawals, yellow for account inquiries).
The Financial Times reports that Citi's "machines will recognise account holders' thumbprints, eliminating the need for a personal identification number, and will have colour-coded screen instructions and voiceovers to help guide them through transactions."

Short of asking Citigroup, there's no way of knowing whether this is just a coincidence, or if they used PRODEM as a starting point. It sure sounds like Citigroup did their homework, though, and that a successful model piloted by a NGO-turned-bank (PRODEM) will now be part of a financial giant's BOP strategy.

(This article continues past the break; click "Read More" to continue)

. . . . .
Submitted by Al Hammond on December 5, 2006 - 09:14.

This article is re-produced with the kind permission of Russell Southwood, Chief Executive of Balancing Act. Browse this week's edition of their excellent newsletter, or consider subscribing.

The holy grail of cheap computers for emerging markets is producing a sub-$100 laptop for education purposes. One Lap Top Per Child, the initiative launched by MIT's tech showman Nicholas Negroponte took a step nearer last week with its first test production run. But it has a competitor in the shape of a Canadian company producing a similar if
more expensive laptop product called Ink. The road to the holy grail is already littered with the failure of the Brazilian Volks and the Indian Simputer. The Volks never made it into production and the Simputer is under-specified and over-priced. It has had low sales in India and its African distributor closed up shop some while ago. Russell Southwood looks to see whether the latest contenders will overcome the scale of challenges involved in succeeding with low-price computing.

(This article continues past the break; click "Read More" to continue)
. . . . .
Submitted by Seema Patel on December 5, 2006 - 13:33.
Published in: |

Two new World Bank policy papers have come out recently reporting on the status of public and private schools in Pakistan (via PSD Blog). The reports show that, contrary to most perceptions, the average private school is affordable even to the poor. These reports focus specifically on Pakistan. But according to a paper written by James Tooley, this phenomenon is occurring in schools in India, China and Africa as well:
The accepted wisdom is that private schools serve the privileged; everyone else, especially the poor, requires public school. The poor, so this logic goes, need government assistance if they are to get a good education, which helps explain why, in the United States, many school choice enthusiasts believe that the only way the poor can get the education they deserve is through vouchers or charter schools, proxies for those better private or independent schools, paid for with public funds.

But if we reflect on these beliefs in a foreign context and observe low-income families in underprivileged and developing countries, we find these assumptions lacking: the poor have found remarkably innovative ways of helping themselves, educationally, and in some of the most destitute places on Earth have managed to nurture a large and growing industry of private schools for themselves.

Click "Read More" to read a summary of and links to the World Bank papers.
. . . . .
Submitted by Rob Katz on December 6, 2006 - 09:43.
Published in:

Guest poster Bal K. Joshi is the co-founder and managing director of Thamel Dot Com, Kathmandu, Nepal. He is also a partner in Thamel International.

By Bal K. Joshi
From my perspective, recent public dialogue about the development impact of migrant remittances is a little limited. Traditional cash-to-cash money transfers can lack macroeconomic leverage, especially when the funds are used for consumption rather than investment. However remittances can be more then simply funds transfers. Several years ago, we at Thamel Dot Com (TDC) in Nepal asked ourselves a basic question: Are remittances a "product" or a "platform" for development?

At the time, Thamel Dot Com had launched Nepal's first e-commerce portal and was providing Nepalese diaspora with a suite of products and services, including news and information, money transfer and the ability for people living outside of Nepal to remotely purchase goods and services in Nepal for local delivery. Our money transfer service mirrored that of other money transfer companies—remittances were viewed as a "product". Over time, we came to the conclusion that cash-to-cash money transfer, as a product, is not very interesting...or economically dynamic. We became much more interested in our cash-to-products transactions. This interest came from the fact that the financial margins are better when we "productize" remittances; and also because the economic impact is higher when remittances are directly turned into the value for which they are intended.

(This post continues past the break; click "Read More" to continue)

. . . . .
Submitted by Rob Katz on December 6, 2006 - 11:36.

What do cows and cell phones have in common? Until the advent of microfinance, the answer was not much. Over the past twenty or so years, small loans have enabled thousands of low-income clients to purchase a cow – a story we've all heard before. The client sells milk, making money to re-pay the loan and maintain a steady income. In recent years, microfinance clients in Bangladesh, Rwanda, Uganda, and the Philippines have used their loans to purchase cell phones and service through a project called Grameen (now Village) Phone. These entrepreneurs then re-sell minutes on their phone at a slight mark-up to fellow villagers – just like their predecessors sold (and still sell) milk to generate money.

Grameen/Village Phone – combining innovative technology with microfinance and a good business model – has always been one of my favorite base of the pyramid success stories (WRI published an excellent business case study on GrameenPhone way back in 2001). Despite the project's strength, it hasn't grown much beyond its roots in four countries. Even when you have a good, proven idea, it's hard to expand quickly without local offices and staff in new markets. For Village Phone to work, you need to be able to evaluate clients, manage loans, interface with local phone companies, and keep the phones charged and running. The Grameen Foundation has the staff and expertise to do all this in their four operational countries – but why limit such a good model because of a lack of staff?

Grameen Foundation announced today that it will push its own limits: GF will launch Village Phone in new markets worldwide through a sister product called Village Phone Direct. Rather than establish hundreds of field offices, Grameen plans to partner with established microfinance institutions, who have the staff and expertise to manage the program (at least from a financial point of view). To help these MFIs run the technology side, GF has partnered with Nokia to create a Village Phone Equipment Kit. The kit includes a Nokia mobile phone, booster antenna, recharging solution and custom-designed cables to connect all of the components. Local customization allows for MFIs to select the telecommunications provider and local marketing strategy that suits their particular needs. Microfinance clients will purchase the Village Phone Equipment Kit directly through their MFI; as they sell airtime, proceeds will go towards loan repayment and personal income. The program’s simplicity offers "phone operator" as another option for microfinance clients – along with "cow".

(This story continues past the break; click "Read More" to continue)

(Clarification: I just spoke with Liselle Yorke of the Grameen Foundation about the nuanced differences between the Foundation and Grameen Bank/Grameen Phone. It's important to know that the non-profit Grameen Foundation runs the program in Uganda, Rwanda, and the Philippines; the Bangladesh program is managed by the non-profit Grameen Telecom. The Foundation is running Village Phone Direct, with the idea of scaling the model pioneered by Telecom through a network of MFIs. Grameen Phone, the for-profit arm associated with the original Grameen Bank, is not directly involved in this project.)

. . . . .
Submitted by Seema Patel on December 7, 2006 - 15:58.
Published in:

The people of Naini were angry. The primary school in their impoverished Himalayan village had just two teachers for more than 110 children in the first through fifth grades. Their kids spent most of the time working on their own. With so many students per teacher, and each teacher working with five grade levels, one father of two boys, farmer Diwan Singh Rawat, asked: ''How is the teacher going to teach?'' Rawat, who supplements his agricultural income by running a small shop that sells biscuits, candies, and cigarettes, says: ''Even if children go for six months to the government school, they don't learn anything.''

Excerpt from Business Week online - International Letter from India: Why India's Poor Pay for Private Schools

Professor James Tooley is an authority on this issue (see my earlier post on private schools for the poor) and has been involved in a two-year research project, titled, "Private Schools Serving the Educational Needs of the Poor: A Global Research and Dissemination Project" funded by an $800,000 Templeton research grant. Through data collection and case studies, Professor Tooley and his research team have been examining educational performance, cost effectiveness and impact on social factors such as crime with regard to government schools. Like the popular microfinance model that has made a global impact in the world of philanthropy, Tooley’s findings suggest that the root causes of poverty can be best addressed when people have a stake in their own educational destiny.

(This post continues past the break; click "Read More" to continue.)


. . . . .
Submitted by Derek Newberry on December 8, 2006 - 10:51.

Sustainable enterprises in emerging economies take another step forward this month, this time in Brazil. On December 14, New Ventures Brazil will host its 3rd annual Investor Forum. The new 2006 selection of New Ventures enterprises, including companies from seven states working in clean technology, new materials, organic agriculture and other sectors will be presented at Fundação Getulio Vargas in São Paulo. This was preceded by a separate Investment Forum on December 6-7 hosted by FINEP, Brazil’s Agency for Innovation and Entrepreneurship, which featured New Ventures enterprises among other small businesses presenting their business models to potential investors - check out Linax's great presentation as an example of some of the great material we saw (in portuguese). 

Some may ask what significance this flurry of activity holds. Think-tanks and development organizations seem to constantly be convening forums and conferences around specialized issues, so what is important about small and medium size enterprises (SMEs), and why support them?
. . . . .
Submitted by Derek Newberry on December 8, 2006 - 17:09.
Published in: |
Another sustainable company success story to take you into the weekend:  this one starts with a relatively simple concept.  Chinese industry is experiencing plenty of growth right now, and can in many ways be considered the engine driving the country's healthy economy.  But this rapid expansion has brought about significant inefficiencies - 58 percent of energy consumption in East Asia can be attributed to China, and much of this to the industrial sector.  Much of this consumption, up to 60 percent in some facilities, ends up being wasted energy.  Why not turn this incredible output of energy into cost savings?
. . . . .
Submitted by williamkramer on December 11, 2006 - 15:51.
Published in:

Let me add my thoughts to Bal Joshi's fine post of 12/6 and AnnaLee Saxenian's reply of 12/8. I couldn't agree more with most of the points made in both. The notion of remittances as a development platform is just right, in my view, and Ms. Saxenian strikes a fair balance on "good" and "bad" remittance impacts. When remittances become just another form of dependency, they get in the way of real development. I take note, however, of what might be a few hidden traps buried in Bal Joshi's post.

Bal offers three primary justifications for them. First, it reduces costs; second, it increases sender control, "lowering waste and misuse"; third, it offers "the sender more options" for productive use, such as savings, build-up of capital, etc.; and fourth, it fosters creativity in the pipeline. My concern comes in points 2 and 3, as both are, to my perhaps over-sensitized ears, reminiscent of the "top-down" and "north to south" control that has so plagued development policy in the past. A considerable amount of criticism of the BOP agenda (particularly as relates to Prahalad's enthusiastic portrayal of creating the capacity to consume) has revolved around "misuse" of this new-found buying power. This approach can, and often does, take on a moralistic tone; however well intentioned, this kind of guidance is usually counterproductive.  Economic empowerment is all about choice, and yes, some of the choices will be less than fully efficient, or productive, or even healthy.

(This post continues past the break; click "Read More" to continue)
. . . . .
Submitted by Rob Katz on December 15, 2006 - 08:47.
Published in:

Guest poster Bal K. Joshi is the co-founder and managing director of Thamel Dot Com, Kathmandu, Nepal. He is also a partner in Thamel International.

By Bal K. Joshi
William Kramer's comments
are well taken. His words certainly reflect our belief, that "...economic empowerment is all about choice." However, I would like to add that economic empowerment also includes personal control. Treating remittances as a platform--giving diaspora the choice of directly converting those funds into products and services back in their homeland--allows them to make well informed decisions on the use of their hard-earned dollars. This is not about "top-down" or "North-South" control; it is about value-chain control. The only choice with traditional money transfer services is to remit cash, and the only control is trust and a prayer.

It is important to point out that the transformation in our thinking about remittances and development has been driven from the "bottom-up"; influenced by the stake-holders in the remittance value chain. There are two primary beneficiaries of remittances: beneficiary #1 is the third party (friends or families) receiving the funds (or equivalent); beneficiary #2 is the “remitter” or the diaspora. Both beneficiaries have needs that have to be supported by the remittance platform. It’s a known fact that most of the remittances sent home are used for daily consumption by beneficiary #1. This use of the remittances also meets the needs of beneficiary #2 by providing their desired support for their family. We also agree that the primary developmental impact of this daily consumption is the spending of the money (directly or indirectly) with merchants in the local economy. However, on the ground in Nepal, we see two realities: the massive misuse of remittances by recipients (beneficiary #1); and a strong diaspora (beneficiary #2) interest to invest in SME enterprises.

(This post continues past the break; click "Read More" to continue)
. . . . .
Submitted by Derek Newberry on December 15, 2006 - 11:10.
Published in: |

India's rapid industrialization and urbanization is a boon to the national economy but a serious challenge in terms of an unfettered rise in energy usage and GHG emissions.  So far, India's per capita energy consumption has remained one of the lowest in Asia, because of its vast rural populace with little access to energy infrastructure.

 

This will change in the next few decades as India's booming IT sector, fueled by telecom investments and massive outsourcing, will cause new office buildings and facilities to sprout up on the horizons of cities like Bangalore and New Delhi.  Per-capita carbon emissions will triple by 2020 and overall energy consumption, which doubled between 1980 and 2001 will continue to rise.

These figures and ominous predictions in many ways parallel the experience of another Asian powerhouse - China.  It is fitting then that this week's featured company offer a similar service to WorldWell, the company I discussed earlier.


(This post continues past the break; click "Read More" to continue)

. . . . .
Submitted by Rob Katz on December 15, 2006 - 14:34.
Published in:
Fresh from the "base of the pyramid" wire services (aka the info [at] nextbillion (dot) net e-mail address) comes word from the Skoll Foundation and Acumen Fund about a big new partnership, and from CGAP about their new technology program:

The Skoll Foundation, dedicated to advancing the work of social entrepreneurs around the world, today announced a $1.5 million, three-year, field-building partnership with Acumen Fund, a nonprofit venture fund that uses entrepreneurial approaches to create and support  sustainable, scalable solutions addressing poverty in the developing world. The grant builds on the productive relationship the two organizations started in 2002, and provides new opportunities to leverage the foundation’s and Acumen’s complementary knowledge, skills, partners and assets. The Skoll Foundation seeks to support Acumen’s work with social entrepreneurs and its efforts to develop metrics that will advance the field’s understanding of the financial and social impact of social enterprise. Acumen focuses on creating lasting solutions in the worldwide fight against poverty by supporting social entrepreneurs working within a market framework. Acumen does not give grants; instead, it provides equity and loans and charges near market interest rates.  To measure its progress, Acumen is creating an innovative metrics system that measures social returns and attempts to quantify the cost of delivering services using an entrepreneurial model rather than a charitable model.  Acumen will report back to the foundation annually on outcomes, challenges and lessons learned.

And from CGAP:

(This post continues past the break; click "Read More" to continue)

. . . . .
Submitted by Rob Katz on December 15, 2006 - 16:24.
Published in:
Jeannie Yamine of the International Finance Corporation (and author of the excellent Innovations in Emerging Markets blog) covered the recent meeting of the International Private Enterprise Group - DC, which was held this past Wednesday on the patio at Zorba's Cafe:

Every so often, something happens that makes the thousands of blog postings, discussions, links, questions, and counter-opinions come together and take a community from talk to action. That's precisely what happened last night over souvlaki sandwiches at Zorba's Cafe in northwest Washington DC .

About 25 individuals -- total strangers in real life but close friends through months spent trading the latest cutting-edge knowledge on the 'nexus of private enterprise and development' -- came together to do what everyone said blogs could do: bring a very diverse community together and tap their individual strengths for action on a common cause.

Such praise - thanks Jeannie!  Future IPEG-DC meetings will be announced here on NextBillion.net as well.  For more about the group, its history, and its connection to Washington, read my previous post.

(And for the record, we're going to change venues from time to time, despite the excellent souvlaki offered at Zorba's).
. . . . .